Managing risk in global supply chains

The book Strategies for Building Successful Global Businesses, by the INSEAD-Wharton Alliance on Globalizing, contains 6 articles on managing risk and uncertainty. Today I will look at one of these articles that deserves further mentioning: Managing risk in global supply chains by Paul W. Kleindorfer and Luk N. van Wassenhove.

The article starts off with a brief recap of the development of supply chain management, and why supply chain risk management has become increasingly important. A supply chain is essentially a network consisting of suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, retailers and customers. The network supports three flows, requiring careful design and close coordination, if risk is to be avoided:

  • Material flows
  • Information flows
  • Financial flows

These flows are sometimes referred to as the “3Bs” of supply chain management:



  • Boxes
  • Bytes
  • Bucks

Traditionally, the boxes have received the most attention, but all three flows are equally important, since disruptions can occur in any of them, thus halting the supply chain.

The flows, in turn, are supported by three pillars:

  • Processes
  • Organizational structure
  • Technologies

Supply chain risk management must address both the flows and the pillars the floes rest on.In essence, the article differs between two types of risk:

  • Supply-demand coordination risk
  • Disruption risk

In battling these risks companies normally draw upon three approaches:

  • Supply chain design
  • Contracting
  • Risk management systems

Supply-demand coordination risks can be addressed using

  • Three dimensional concurrent engineering
  • Dynamic supply-demand balancing
  • Closed loop supply chains
  • B2B exchanges

In terms of managing disruption risk, the article looks at

  • Purposeful triggers
  • Accidental triggers

So far so good, but this is where the article suddenly drops in usefulness. Whereas supply-demand coordination is dealt with in detail, disruption risk only receive a cursory review. Terrorist attacks or changes in regulations are seen as examples of purposeful triggers, and accidental triggers are near misses or on-site accidents like fires or chemical spills. Admittedly, these risk should be of major concern to any company, however, I fail to to see their significance as disruption risks. On the other hand, the article does suggest multi-level exercises at each link in the supply chain as a method to uncover vulnerabilities and to find ways to mitigate or respond to these vulnerabilities. In addition, the article also makes a point in underscoring that supply chain design decisions should not be done purely on the basis of cost and revenue determinants.

In conclusion, and this is where I agree with the authors, the basic challenge is finding the right balance between the leanness and the robustness of supply chains, and thus increasing the overall returns in global supply chains.

Reference

Kleindorfer, P. R. and van Wassenhove, L.N. (2004) Managing Risk in Global Supply Chains. In: The INSEAD-Wharton Alliance on Globalizing – Strategies for Building Sucessful Global Businesses. Eds. Gatignon, H. and Kimberly, J.R., pp. 288-305. Cambridge University Press.

Author links

Related

Posted in ARTICLES and PAPERS
Tags: , , , ,

ARTICLES and PAPERS
A grounded definition of supply risk
Risk has many facets and has been studied widely in many settings for many decades. But risk in a su[...]
3PL Outsourcing - Challenges and Benefits
A couple of weeks ago I blogged about the flexibility of the logistics provider and how the transpor[...]
BOOKS and BOOK CHAPTERS
Book Review: Logistics Management and Strategy
Logistics Management and Strategy by Alan Harrison and Remko van Hoek does come at very hefty price,[...]
Book Review: Risk Modeling, Assessment, and Management
First published in 1998 and now already in its 3rd edition in 2009, but still unknown to me, althoug[...]
REPORTS and WHITEPAPERS
Infrastructure - essential for competitiveness?
Regular readers of this blog may have noticed my regular rants about the state of the Norwegian infr[...]
Global Risk Reports
While waiting for the World Economic Forum Global Risk Report for 2009, the continuation of the Glob[...]