7 out of 10 businesses without a continuity plan

An article today in the paper issue of Dagens Næringsliv, the Norwegian equivalent of the Financial Times or Wall Street Journal,  presents a survey among businesses considered to be part of the country’s critical infrastructure, saying that 7 out of 10 businesses do not have a contingency plan in case of ICT failure (Information and Communication Technology). This was a hot issue 10 years ago, when everybody was fearing the transition to Y2K, but since then complacency seems to have taken over. Maybe we take our computers and mobile phones so much for granted that we forget that they could fail?

A nightmare scenario

You may think, hey, how does ICT-failure link up with supply chain risk? But consider this, how are you going to communicate with your suppliers or customers if there is no Internet connection or no phone lines? How are you going to process orders without a functioning ERP? According to the above survey, which is also cited on e24.no, 80% of the businesses asked said they would be unable to function without Internet or phone lines. Yet, only 30% had made contingency plans or contractual agreements with their ICT suppliers in case of failure.

The survey

The survey was done by the Norwegian Post and Telecommunications Authority (NPT). NPT is an autonomous administrative agency under the Norwegian Ministry of Transport and Communications, with monitoring and regulatory responsibilities for the postal and telecommunications markets in Norway. The survey report (in Norwegian) can be downloaded here: Samfunnskritiske verksemder og avhenga til ekom i krisesituasjonar.



ICT Risk = Supply Chain Risk?

A lot of supply chain risk management focuses on the physical and the relational side of the supply chain, in order to to secure the supply chain itself and the inbound and outbound logistics. ICT is maybe forgotten in all this? I hope not. ICT is an integral part of any supply chain. In my humble opinion, not having an ICT contingency plan show how little businesses understand (or care) about their supply chain.

A victim of cost-cutting?

These days, cost-cutting is receiving much attention. Let’s hope that this cost-cutting does not lead to contingency plan-cutting as well. That could be one cut too many, should the unthinkable occur.

Related

Posted in THIS and THAT
Tags: , , ,

ARTICLES and PAPERS
Transportation Lifelines and Critical Infrastructure
This is the first paper that sparked my research interest in transportation vulnerability, and what [...]
What is risk?
What is risk, and how can it be expressed? Should risk be defined through probabilities or should ri[...]
BOOKS and BOOK CHAPTERS
Book Review: Enterprise SCM
Have you ever played SimCity? I never liked Transport Tycoon that much, but I used to play SimCity a[...]
Book Review: Ethical Risk
This is - for the time being - the sixth and final review of the books in the Gower Short Guides to [...]
REPORTS and WHITEPAPERS
Supply chain vulnerability: an invisible global risk?
Supply chain disruption - a global issue? All companies and governments dependent on external suppli[...]
Will Climate Change have an impact on transportation?
Many studies have already examined the potential impacts of climate change on broad sectors of the e[...]