Mitigating supply chain disruptions

How could I have missed this paper? I was preparing my 2009-lecture on supply chain risk for tomorrow and while looking for some YouTube videos on supply chain risk to spice up my 3-hour presentation, I came across a short snippet featuring Christopher Tang from UCLA, who was talking about three strategies for building a robust supply chain, related to (1) supply, (2) product, and (3) demand. The video does not refer to it, but fascinated as I was, I did some more digging and came up with his 2006 paper Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions, which list not three, but nine strategies.

Product , Supply, Demand

In the video, Tang refers to 3 incidents that identify the three strategies:

Product: Nokia changed product configurations in the nick of time to meet customer demand during a supply disruption, the infamous Albuquerque Philips plant fire.

Supply: Hong-Kong based Li and Fung changed its supply plan in a flash to meet customer demand during a currency crisis, the 1997 Asian meltdown.



Demand: Dell changed its pricing strategy just in time to satisfy customers during supply shortage, after the 1999 Taiwan earthquake.

Nine strategies

These three incidents are highlighted in the above mentioned paper. In addition, Tang lists six more strategies that can make supply chains more robust, nine strategies in all:

  • Postponement
    • Nokia’s modular design allowed it to switch to other components after the supply shortage
  • Strategic stock
    • Planned stockpiling of regular demand at central locations to serve areas in need or shortage
  • Flexible supply base
    • If one supplier goes down, the other can take over, some for basic demand, some for high volume fluctuations
  • Make and buy
    • Always keep some production in-house, outsource basic items, make high-end items in-house
  • Economic supply incentives
    • Commit to buying certain quantities from a certain supplier to keep the (backup) business running
  • Flexible transportation
    • Muliti-modal, multi-carrier, multi-routes transportation, avoid chokepoints
  • Dynamic pricing and promotion
    • Sell what you have, don’t delay or promise to supply what you don’t have
  • Assortment planning
    • For retailers, displaying what’s in stock, influence customer choice and demand
  • Silent product rollover
    • Do not market the introduction of new products or the end of old products

That easy?

christopher-tang-supply-chain-disruptionChristopher Tang is an excellent speaker and an excellent writer. After seeing the video, and reading the paper, all I can say is “Wow. Is it really that easy”? Perhaps it is, if you start to think about  it. How much of the above is actually just common sense? Maybe we don’t need big fancy theories and complicated frameworks. As some famous company has said before, Think Simple. I think it’s time for that.

References

Tang, C. (2006). Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions International Journal of Logistics, 9 (1), 33-45 DOI: 10.1080/13675560500405584

Author link

Related

Posted in ARTICLES and PAPERS
Tags: , , , , ,

ARTICLES and PAPERS
Resilience revisited
How many ways are there for defining vulnerability and criticality, really? Traditionally, risk matr[...]
Risks and supply chains... stochastically speaking2
A word of warning: This is not your typical journal article on supply chain risk. Risks and supply c[...]
BOOKS and BOOK CHAPTERS
Book Review: Customs Risk
International trade and global supply chains are filled with goods that are criss-crossing the globe[...]
Supply Chain Logistics Risk in Germany
What are the most common supply chain and logistics risks that businesses and logistics providers ha[...]
REPORTS and WHITEPAPERS
Infrastructure - essential for competitiveness?
Regular readers of this blog may have noticed my regular rants about the state of the Norwegian infr[...]
ISO 28002 – Supply Chain Resilience
Have you heard of ISO 28002?  No? You should take note of this standard, because the ISO 28000 serie[...]