Vulnerable or valuable supply chain?

More than a year old now, but still holding not so few words of wisdom is the Pricewaterhouse Coopers report on supply chain integrity: From vulnerable to valuable. Their analysis shows that moving away from the typical business mindset of supply chain improvements only in terms of cost reductions is well worth the effort. Companies must invest in enhancing the integrity of their supply chains, in a manner which balances operational objectives with reputational risks. This requires developing “leading risk indicators” in addition to the typical Key Performance Indicators, in order to measure supply chain performance.

Supply chain disruptions are costly

Companies do not recover quickly from a supply chain disruption. In the PWC analysis, two-thirds of affected companies were lagging their peers in stock price performance a year after the disruption. Sheffi’s disruption profile, which has been mentioned time and again on this blog, holds true: A company suffering from a supply chain disruption will not get back to business as usual for a long time, and will sustain a long-term effect. As the Swedish mobile manufacturer Ericsson experienced in 2001, an ill-handled supply chain disruption can in fact lead to business discontinuity.

Supply chain integrity

A company must always balance objectives and risk, so says PWC in their report. They call it achieving supply chain integrity.



Supply chain integrity must encompass both operational and reputational dimensions. Operational integrity refers to the ability of the supply chain to meet objectives for quality, productivity, and financial performance. Reputational integrity refers to the ability of the supply chain to protect and enhance the brand, respond to customer and investor concerns, and comply with the growing burden of legislation.

On the operational side:

  • Product quality assurance and failure remediation
  • Operations and processes
  • Economic transactions and contractual agreements

On the reputational side:

  • Social and labor practices and standards
  • Environmental practices and standards
  • Ethical practices and standards

Disruptions and quality control issues are often caused not by a single factor, but by the convergence of many, and it is not always easy to distinguish between operational and reputational reasons for supply chain disruptions. However, in the mind of the public, everything is reputational.

Words of wisdom

The report is specked with examples and supply chain cases from the business world, showing the good and the not so good handlings of supply chain disruptions, and what indicators that some companies have developed to measure their supply chain integrity. It’s well worth a read, even from an academic point of view.

Reference

PricewaterhouseCooper (2008) From valuable to vulnerable: how integrity can transform a supply chain. Achieving operational excellence series. Industry whitepaper.

Download

Related

Posted in REPORTS and WHITEPAPERS
Tags: , , , ,

ARTICLES and PAPERS
Adaptation versus Transformation
Many businesses believe themselves to be nested in a stable environment and are confounded when thin[...]
Supply Chain Confidence
Did a 2001 white paper turn into a 2004 academic journal article just like that? In Mitigating suppl[...]
BOOKS and BOOK CHAPTERS
Book review: Cost-Benefit Analysis: Theory and Application
I really enjoyed reading Cost-Benefit Analysis: Theory and Application by Tefvik Nas.  I used this b[...]
Book review: Supply Chain Risk Management
Edited by Robert B. Handfield, the book Supply Chain Risk Management: Minimizing Disruptions in Glob[...]
REPORTS and WHITEPAPERS
Global Risks 2009 - Countries at risk?
How will the current financial downturn affect supply chains? That's what we all wonder about, isn't[...]
Assess the vulnerability of your production system
So far I have reviewed "international" literature and web sites, and it is only fitting that now it [...]