Overcoming locational disadvantage

Following up my previous post, Sparse transportation networks – a recipe for supply chain disruptions?, when it comes to a business’ physical location in relation to the functioning of the supply chain, obviously there are good locations and bad locations. Can a business’ organization compensate for that? Yes – by either structuring its supply chain or honing its organization, thus going from badly located to well located and from badly prepared to well prepared.

Design Characteristics and Mitigation Capabilities

In The Severity of Supply Chain Disruptions: Design Characteristics and Mitigation Capabilities, Craighead et al. contend that the severity of supply chain disruptions are linked to a) the supply chain design characteristics and b) the supply chain mitigation capabilities. I like to look at it this way: the impact of supply chains disruptions depend on a) the structure and b) the organization of the supply chain, where the structure makes up the physical side (a) of the supply chain and the organization makes up the human side (b) of the supply chain. These two parts are complementary in that both are needed for the successful handling of a supply chain disruption, while at the same time, a deficiency in one part can be compensated by the strength of the other part, i.e. a badly structured supply chain can be strengthened by a well organized supply chain. How?

Resilient organizations

In the New Zealand research project Resilient Organisations the focus is NOT on the vulnerability of  systems to failure, but on the ability to manage and minimize the impact of any failures.  This is achieved by focusing on organizational preparedness.



If the supply chain structure represents a company’s location and the supply chain mitigation capabilities or organization represent a company’s preparedness, ideally then, a company will be both well-located and well-prepared vis-à-vis any form of disruption. Conversely, given a supply chain structure prone to disruption, combined with a lack of organization, a company will be both badly located and badly prepared. This implies that firms placed in disadvantageous locations can notably better their supply chain by focusing on improving their supply chain characteristics.

Location versus preparation

In regions or countries with sparse transportation networks or few transportation mode choices the structure or design of the supply chain becomes an important factor in determining if a company has an advantageous or a disadvantageous location.

By re-designing the structure, locational disadvantages can be lessened or entirely eliminated, and a supply chain wise “badly” located company can become “well” located. Conversely, if the structure cannot be improved (or not be improved further), by re-designing the organization, proper training and adding supply chain visibility such that early warnings and early proactive and reactive actions are possible, a company can turn from badly prepared into well prepared.

Related

Posted in THIS and THAT
Tags: , , , , , ,

ARTICLES and PAPERS
Adaptation versus Transformation
Many businesses believe themselves to be nested in a stable environment and are confounded when thin[...]
Risk Management: Contingent versus Mitigative
The risk management literature separates between mitigative actions or strategies and contingent act[...]
BOOKS and BOOK CHAPTERS
Book Review:Managing Risks in Supply Chains
To make up for yesterday's perhaps overly harsh critique of just one article from this book, this is[...]
Risk and vulnerability in maritime supply chains
This week's focus are risks in the maritime supply chain. Today's article reflects on security in ma[...]
REPORTS and WHITEPAPERS
ISO 28002 – Supply Chain Resilience
Have you heard of ISO 28002?  No? You should take note of this standard, because the ISO 28000 serie[...]
Global Risks 2009 - Countries at risk?
How will the current financial downturn affect supply chains? That's what we all wonder about, isn't[...]