Economists versus Technocrats – who wins?

In the current financial downturn, much pressure has been on the government (here in Norway, and I bet elsewhere too) to initiate public works projects or other public investment projects in order to create or save jobs, and last month the Norwegian government indeed presented a plan aimed at securing employment by increasing renovation and maintenance of public buildings, and by investing in railways, roads and harbors nationwide. But, are all projects worthwhile?

Politics?

Part of my dayjob is to do Quality Assurance of major investment projects. Established by the Norwegian Ministry of Finance in 2000, the Quality Assurance Scheme is performed by external consultants under a framework contract, providing a second opinion on major investment projects. So far so good. What is not so good is that our second opinion isn’t always heard, as is the case of rail versus road in Bergen, where the question was whether to build a 2nd parallel rail tunnel because the existing tunnel was stretched beyond capacity or whether to build a road tunnel  because the road network is utterly congested. From an overall cost-benefit perspective, building a  road tunnel was preferable to building a rail tunnel, yet the government decided to go for  rail, and not in favor of the road. Why? Personally I think it is because politically, rail is environment-friendly and inline with the climate change mantra of reducing car traffic and increasing ridership on mass transit. Nothing wrong with that, but what about when it is not economically sound to do? Or maybe it is the economists who have it wrong?

Why QA?

I should add that I was not involved in the particular QA of said project. It just came to my mind when I read this article (in Norwegian), where the head of Jernbaneverket, the Norwegian National Rail Administration, expresses his satisfaction at the governments decision to listen to his particular needs rather than listening to the economists who disqualified the rail project and decided in favor of the road tunnel.



In the end…

…public investment projects are always political decisions, are they not? Is QA even necessary?

Posted in THIS and THAT
Tags: , , , , ,

ARTICLES and PAPERS
Less supply chain disruptions with vendor managed inventory?
How does a traditional supply chain compare to a vendor managed inventory supply chain when it comes[...]
Transportation - the forgotten staple
What a difference a title makes. I only found this article because it was referenced in another arti[...]
BOOKS and BOOK CHAPTERS
Book review: GIS for Transportation
Having been a student with Harvey Miller at the University of Utah 2000-2002 probably makes my revie[...]
Book Review: Transportation Network Analysis
Transportation Network Analysis by M. G. H. Bell and Yasunori Iida is a book for the expert rather t[...]
REPORTS and WHITEPAPERS
Supply Chain and Transport Risk
In our interconnected world, safety, reliability and efficiency can only be secured through collabor[...]
Analysing road vulnerability in Norway
How does the Norwegian Public Roads Administration NRPA assess the vulnerability of the Norwegian ro[...]