The German automotive industry. Volkswagen, Mercedes, Porsche, Audi, BMW. The embodiment of craftsmanship, functionality and reliability. Cars that work and an industry that knows how to make it work. But how about supply chain risk management? Does that work equally well? That is what Jörn-Henrik Thun and Daniel Hoenig set out to investigate in daptive Fit Versus Robust Transformation: How Organizations Respond to Environmental Change. Interestingly, the results show that the group using reactive supply chain risk management seems to do better in terms of disruptions resilience or the reduction of the bullwhip effect, whereas the group pursuing preventive supply chain risk management seems to do better as to flexibility or safety stocks.

Continue reading →